Overclocked Gaming Performance
-
MSI X58 Pro (3.9GHz CPU, 1.56GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Foxconn Renaissance (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (4.1GHz CPU, 1.23GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Asus Rampage II Gene (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
Foxconn Renaissance (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
-
MSI X58 Pro (3.9GHz CPU, 1.56GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (4.1GHz CPU, 1.23GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Asus Rampage II Gene (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
Frames Per Second - higher is better
Despite eeking out a solid 4GHz the overclocked performance in games is lower than the competition, although only slightly, so you'd be hard pushed to tell the difference.
Image Editing, Video Encoding and Multitasking
Real world applications benchmarks such as the ones below are a great way to see the benefits an overclock provides for everyday PC use. Some motherboards respond better than others when overclocking even their CPUs are clocked at the same speeds and in the gaming performance tests we found that the Renaissance was a particularly happy bunny when overclocked.
-
Asus Rampage II Gene (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHZ DDR3 CL8)
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (4.1GHz CPU, 1.23GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
MSI X58 Pro (3.9GHz CPU, 1.56GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Foxconn Renaissance (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (4.1GHz CPU, 1.23GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Asus Rampage II Gene (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
-
Foxconn Renaissance (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
-
MSI X58 Pro (3.9GHz CPU, 1.56GHz DDR3 CL7)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Foxconn Renaissance (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
-
Asus Rampage II Gene (4GHz CPU, 1.6GHz DDR3 CL8)
-
MSI X58 Pro (3.9GHz CPU, 1.56GHz DDR3 CL7)
-
Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (4.1GHz CPU, 1.23GHz DDR3 CL7)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
Overall we'd have to say the performance is very good, as the Gene either hits the top of the table or only a second or so from it in every test, so while gaming is slightly slower, application performance is solid.
Want to comment? Please log in.